| Assembly Bill 385 |
Assembly Member Goldsmith |
| Title: |
Home Rule School Districts |
| Location: |
Held in Senate |
|
Bill Text / History / Status |
| STRS Position: |
Neutral if Amended |
| Proponents: |
California Teachers Association, California School Employees Association, Montebello
Teachers Association |
| Opponents: |
CalPERS - Neutral With Amendments |
| Analysis: |
As Amended 1/14/1998 |
This bill would establish a procedure for a school district to convert to a "home
rule" school district by a resolution of the district's governing board. The bill
also establishes a procedure for granting home rule petitions for the establishment of new
home rule school districts through the State Board of Education. Under this bill a home
rule school district would be treated as a charter school.
Chapter 849, Statutes of 1996 (SB 1883, Hayden), lifted the cap on the total number of
charter schools in the state, set at 100, to 112, with the last 12 reserved for Los
Angeles Unified School District.
AB-385 is very similar to AB-66 (Goldsmith), from the 1995-96 Session, which was vetoed
by the Governor because of the requirement that home rule districts hire only credentialed
teachers and retain existing collective bargaining provisions.
Under current law, a group or individual may circulate a petition to create a
"charter school" within an existing public school district. A charter school,
with some exceptions, is governed by the provisions of the charter, rather than the
requirements of state law, local policies, or local collective bargaining agreements.
Charters must include a variety of provisions including pupil achievement, governance of
the school, admissions, discipline, staff qualifications, certain employee rights, and a
number of other criteria. Charter petitions must be signed by at least half of the
teachers at the school (or by 10% of the teachers district-wide) and approved by the
school district's governing board. Current law, which allows for the creation of 112
charter schools in the state (Chapter 849, Statutes of 1996 (SB 1883, Hayden)), lifted the
cap on the total number of charter schools in the state, set at 100, with the last 12
reserved for Los Angeles Unified School District.
On December 11, 1997, SRI International completed the interim evaluation of charter
schools that was required by AB 2135 (Mazzoni), Chapter 767, Statutes of 1996. However,
the evaluation does not speak specifically to the issue of home rule school districts.
According to the California Teachers' Association, the sponsor of AB-385, the bill
would free participating school districts from the provisions of the Education Code, while
preserving provisions relating to collective bargaining agreements. Under the bill, the
new home school districts must use credentialed teachers and be evaluated. The 20 home
rule school districts petitions, approved by the State Board of Education, must contain
the same descriptions of academic standards, operating procedures, and parental
involvement as charter schools.
Specifically, AB-385 requires that school district governing boards enact a resolution
stating the district's willingness to be presented with home rule petitions and
acknowledging the district's responsibility to pay for the costs of verifying signatures
on any petition.
The home rule district charter petitions must be signed by 50 percent of the teachers
in the district. The revocable charter itself must include a specific program description,
but may not alter the existing statutory requirements related to the membership and
election of school district governing boards.
AB-385 requires that home rule school districts recognize existing collective
bargaining laws, statutory due process rights for certificated employees, and civil
service and merit systems for classified employees.
The bill limits the number of home rule school districts that may operate during a
school year to 20 and specifies that, for 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001, no more than
five of the 20 home rule districts approved by the State Board of Education may be
districts with operating budgets in excess of $100 million.
School districts over 400,000 Average Daily Attendance would not be permitted to become
a home rule school district.
The bill also requires the Legislative Analyst to contract for an evaluation of home
rule school districts and present the results to the Legislature and Governor by January
1, 2004.
AB-385 contains ambiguous language relating to the retirement system coverage for
teachers within the home rule school districts and should be clarified with amendments.
Program - None.
Administrative - STRS staff notes an increased work load, however, absorbable
within existing resources.
- Neutral If Amended
AB-385 should be amended to reflect the retirement system coverage for employees of the
home rule school districts created under the bill.
Assembly Bill 385 posted: May 21, 1998
|