Core Governance Principles – Shareholder
CalSTRS votes on a variety of governance related shareholder proposals. Examples of the issues voted on include: Removing classified boards of directors, requiring an independent board chairman, eliminating poison pills, majority voting in director elections, the right to call special meetings, the right to act by written consent, and requiring shareholder approval for large severance packages. Shareholder proposals relating to core governance rights are almost always supported.
- Number Voted: 259
- Voted For: 236 (91%)
- Voted Against: 23 (9%)
Compensation Issues – Shareholder
Shareholder proposals on compensation issues cover a wide range of topics including retaining bonuses, pay for performance, tax gross-ups and death-benefit packages (golden coffins). Compensation proposals are evaluated based on .
- Number Voted: 75
- Voted For: 55 (73%)
- Voted Against: 20 (27%)
Social Proposals – Shareholder
Shareholder proposals relating to social issues such as animal rights, human rights, healthcare and diversity are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
- Number Voted: 41
- Voted For: 20 (49%)
- Voted Against: 21 (51%)
Environmental Proposals – Shareholder
Shareholder proposals relating to environmental issues such as sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy policy and hydraulic fracturing are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
- Number Voted: 69
- Voted For: 26 (38%)
- Voted Against: 43 (62%)
Political-related Proposals – Shareholder
- Number Voted: 94
- Voted For: 55 (59%)
- Voted Against: 39 (41%)
Miscellaneous Issues – Shareholder
The most common miscellaneous shareholder proposals relate to succession planning, capital allocation and company specific issues. These issues are voted on a case-by-case basis.
- Number Voted: 17
- Voted For: 5 (29%)
- Voted Against: 12 (71%)
2013-14 Shareholder Proposals
The following chart illustrates the type and volume of the major shareholder proposals that staff considered during fiscal year 2013-14.
A year-over-year analysis was also done that compared the number of proposals considered during fiscal year 2013-14 against the number of similar proposals considered during the last seven years.
An interesting trend is the decline in shareholder proposals relating to traditional governance issues such as board declassification.
The mandatory introduction of Say-on-Pay in 2011 initially appeared to reduce the number of compensation-related shareholder proposals. However, after declining in 2010-11, compensation-related shareholder proposals increased again over the past years as shareholders appear to have renewed focus on having executives retain a percentage of their awarded equity shares as compensation until retirement or preventing executives from receiving their unvested equity awards when their company experiences a change in control event, such as in the case of a merger or acquisition.
Environmental-related proposals have been declining in the past couple of years but increased this fiscal year as shareholders have renewed interest in sustainability and fossil fuel risks.
As for social proposals, the ones focusing on political contributions and lobbying increased from 81 to 94 proposals over the past year. However, the number of proposals on other social issues decreased from 63 to 41 over the same time period.